Radical Movements and the Logic of Conflation

Smoke rises from buildings following what witnesses said was an Israeli air strike, as Palestinians search for victims under the rubble of a house which police said was destroyed in another Israeli air strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip July 11, 2014. Israel pressed on for a fourth day with its Gaza offensive on Friday, striking the Hamas-dominated enclave from air and sea, as Palestinian militants kept up rocket attacks deep into the Jewish state. At least 79 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in the offensive, which Israel says it launched to end persistent rocket attacks on its civilian population, some of which have reached Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and other cities. (REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa)
Smoke rises from buildings following what witnesses said was an Israeli air strike, as Palestinians search for victims under the rubble of a house which police said was destroyed in another Israeli air strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip July 11, 2014. Israel pressed on for a fourth day with its Gaza offensive on Friday, striking the Hamas-dominated enclave from air and sea, as Palestinian militants kept up rocket attacks deep into the Jewish state. At least 79 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in the offensive, which Israel says it launched to end persistent rocket attacks on its civilian population, some of which have reached Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and other cities. (REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa)

New Statesman | Times of Israel pulls “permissible genocide” blog.

If there is anything that pontiffs, policy analysts and decision-makers need to do it is this: We need to stop conflating radical populist movements whose ideologies call for the destruction of others, and the larger civilian populations that may support and sympathize with these movements for reasons of identity, economy and psychology; reasons that cannot and should not be callously dismissed as illegitimate. 

We also need to stop conflating the leading elite of these movements and their rank-and-file. For while the former are responsible for designing the larger vision and policies, the latter are mere implementation tools with little influence over the decision-making processes.

As such, the people who should be held culpable for any atrocities perpetrated by the rank-and-file, and irrespective of any sympathy shown by the larger civilian populations with their emotional outbursts, which come as reflections of irrational fears and deep ignorance, are the architects and decision-makers of these movements, as well as their donors and enablers beyond. Some exceptions to this rule can be made in case of those few eager and ambitious implementers hoping to rise in the ranks. But targeting the civilian populations involved as an act of collective punishment should never be permitted no matter the circumstance or the justification. Collective punishment, genocide and ethnic cleansing are never justified. Never.